|
"True color" approximation for Earth with 0.6 eccentricity and no
obliquity. |
Hello! If you've been following this blog or series a while I'll assume you
get the basic idea of these explorations, but if not, be sure to check out
the
first post of the series
where I run over my approach and the strengths and weaknesses of the
ExoPlaSim model.
Today we'll be looking at the impact of orbital eccentricity,
variation in a planet's distance from its star over the course of each
orbit. Again you can look to
a previous post
for a more detailed and technical description of orbital mechanics, but
there are a few key points to bear in mind here:
-
Planets always follow elliptical paths with the star at one focus of that
ellipse such that there is a single point each orbit where the planet is
closest to the star, periapsis, receiving the most light, and one
point where it is farthest, apoapsis, receiving the least
light.
-
Eccentricity is (for closed elliptical orbits) defined as the
ratio between the difference between the minimum and maximum distance from
the star (periapsis and apoapsis) and their sum (the total width of the
orbital path, twice the semimajor axis). 0 eccentricity is a perfect
circle, and increasing eccentricity implies ever more elongated ellipses
with a greater contrast between maximum and minimum light from the star;
if eccentricity reaches 1, the planet escapes orbit of the star entirely
(there are more fundamental definitions of eccentricity that can be used
for parabolic or hyperbolic escape trajectories, but we needn't worry
about them here).
-
A planet moves faster along its orbit near periapsis and slower at
apoapsis, such that at high eccentricity a planet will quickly swing near
the star and then spend most of its orbital period crawling along at a
greater distance. In spite of this, average heating over a planet's whole
orbit increases with greater eccentricity for a given semimajor
axis.
|
Planets moving along orbital paths of equal semimajor axis and (red on
the left to pink on the right) 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8
eccentricity (I don't think the timestamp indicates anything
important).
Phoenix7777, Wikimedia
|
Earth's orbital eccentricity is a mere 0.0167, which works out to a bit
under a 7% increase in global insolation (light reaching the surface on
average) from apoapsis to periapsis. By comparison, at 45° latitude, with Earth's tilt of 23.44°, insolation increases by over 300% from winter solstice to summer
solstice. Earth's eccentricity has some subtle effects on global climate—variations of the relative timing of periapsis and the solstices over
thousands of years
appear to be
largely responsible for a cycle of moderately wetter and drier climates in
the Sahara, due to the eccentricity either enhancing (when periapsis and
summer coincide) or dampening (when periapsis occurs in winter) seasonal
temperature variation in the northern hemisphere and so influencing how far
north the tropical rain belt reaches in summer—but it's negligible in terms of the broad global patterns of Earth's
climate (I've been keeping it set to 0 for all models so far for
simplicity's sake), and many a schoolteacher has had to laboriously explain
why our seasons are caused not by variation in distance from the sun but the
less intuitive way in which angling the planet's surface to the sun spreads
out light.
But there are planets out there with higher eccentricity: Mercury's
eccentricity is 0.206, the dwarf planet Sedna's is 0.855, and at least
one exoplanet
has been seen with an eccentricity over 0.95. For such planets (or their
moons), insolation variation due to orbital eccentricity may be comparable
to or even exceed that caused by obliquity. In such cases where eccentricity
dominates, seasons would be globally synchronous rather than offset across
hemispheres; the entire planet would warm near periapsis and cool near
apoapsis.
For purposes of this post, we'll be looking at planets with only orbital
eccentricity and no obliquity; combinations of obliquity and eccentricity
are certainly worth investigating but we'll leave them to another time. I
have
already investigated
a "seasonless" world with 0 obliquity and 0 eccentricity, which we'll take
as our starting point: it required 540 ppm of CO2 to balance at a global average temperature of 14.1 °C, and features a rather polarized mix of rainforests, deserts, and ice
caps, with only scant transitional semiarid and temperate regions and a
somewhat broader tundra belt (which may actually see more glacial coverage
on a real planet).
Note, by the way, that ExoPlaSim has only been able to properly model
eccentricity over 0.1 since version 3.2.1 (released May 2023), and requires
the "Keplerian=True" parameter, so if you installed an older version of
ExoPlaSim you may need to update (though there are some potential issues
with running version 3.3.0 for some people, so if that's still the latest
version you may want to install 3.2.4 instead, using "pip install
exoplasim==3.2.4").
Prior Model: 0 obliquity, 0 eccentricity
Average Temperature: 15.5 °C (13.3 Mar - 17.8 Aug)
Already we can see a marked change from the seasonless world: Savanna,
steppe, and temperate climates have greatly expanded, the ice caps have
retreated (though the 1.5 °C of warming helps as well), and monsoon, subtropical, Mediterranean, and
subarctic climates—all requiring substantial seasonal shifts in temperature or
precipitation—have begun to appear.
0.1 eccentricity works out to about a 50% increase in global insolation,
which causes a bit over 4 °C
swing in global temperatures; locally, most land areas see about
5-10 °C
of variation in monthly temperatures, up to 15 °C in the major deserts. This is similar to the seasonal variation seen in
the tropics on Earth and so probably wouldn't be obvious across much of the
surface, though in cooler temperate areas there may be a clear increase in
snowfall and nighttime frosts.
Note that for all these runs, I set periapsis (greatest insolation) to July
and apoapsis (least insolation) to January (yes, I'm being a bit of a
northern hemisphere chauvinist, sorry Australia), but we'll pretty
consistently see a lag of a month or two between these extremes of
insolation and the actual hottest and coldest months, and this lag is always
longer in winter such that fall is longer than spring. For simplicity's
sake, I'll mostly be showing maps from the hottest and coldest months,
wherever they fall.
This moderate and globally consistent shift in insolation causes fairly
little shift in global circulation, but if you look closely there is a
tendency for winds to more strongly converge into continents in summer,
especially towards the hot deserts.
The result is something like a mild monsoon pattern over much of the world,
with distinct dry and wet seasons appearing in the semiarid regions flanking
the tropics just as we see on our Earth.
0.2
Average Temperature: 15.1 °C (10.7 Mar - 20.2 Aug)
Featuring the victorious return of the continental climates. Global
insolation now more than doubles between apoapsis and periapsis, similar to
local insolation swings between summer and winter at 30°
latitude, so this is now decidedly a seasonal world.
Seasonal temperature shifts of around 20 °C are common across North America, Asia, and north Africa, with some
deserts approaching 70 °C by day in summer,
and even the oceans see around 5 °C of variation,
but curiously temperatures barely vary in equatorial Africa and South
America. This may be related to patterns of circulation.
Much as in the last case, winds converge onto the continents in summer (to
the point that we might even consider the ITCZ to divide in two as it passes
over Africa), and we can perhaps even see a tendency towards offshore winds
in winter, but there's also a marked growth in the width of the Hadley cells
in summer, by as much as 10° latitude in the northern hemisphere, as the sudden influx of heat to the
tropics drives stronger circulation (even though the proportional increase
of insolation across seasons is the same across all latitudes here, the
equator still receives far more average insolation than the higher latitudes
and so that equivalent proportional increase translates to a substantially
greater amount of actual extra heat hitting the surface). This brings more
moisture to the tropics and so increased cloud cover that helps keep it cool
(and conversely, skies clear in winter as Hadley circulation weakens and
converges mostly offshore) but also shifts the polar front and associated
rain belts at high latitudes.
The result is a seasonal rain pattern remarkably similar to our Earth:
mostly consistent rains over the equator, flanking semiarid regions with
summer rains and bone dry winters, the subtropical deserts, and a temperate
semiarid belt with dry summers and wet winters (though still mostly
restricted to west-facing coasts due to predominantly easterly subtropical
winds). The big difference is that this occurs simultaneously across both
hemispheres; Christmas in New Zealand is as cool as in Spain or New York.
There's also not much space for a wet-summer temperate belt due to the
still-rapid drop in temperatures towards the ice caps, so cool Mediterranean
climates—a rare oddity on our Earth—are a major climate region here.
0.3
Average Temperature: 15.7 °C (8.8 Mar - 24.0 Aug)
Things are starting to look...weirdly normal. Certainly some areas still
look out of place and the ice caps are still too large, but the overall
distribution of temperate and continental regions is fairly close to our
world, there's actually some substantial variation in sea ice cover, and you
might be forgiven for mistaking this climate map of the Americas for one of
their real climates at a glance.
The devil's in the details, of course. Substantial parts of North America
and Asia see seasonal temperature swings of over 40 °C, which on Earth occurs mostly only in subarctic regions—but here it occurs in the humid subtropics, areas we're used to thinking
of as fairly consistently wet and warm with mild winters, but in this case swing between sweltering summers sometimes reaching over
60 °C on hot days and winters cool enough for nighttime snow and frost.
Europe is the odd continent out here, still dominated by Mediterranen
climates where it isn't just frozen over, but as summer circulation of
moisture towards the tropics has gotten even stronger, this type of climate
has started appearing even more broadly, even in Japan of all places.
ExoPlaSim always seems a bit biased towards Mediterranean-type climates so
we should maybe be cautious about interpreting this, but it's never quite
manifested in this way so there might be something to it.
There's also a bit more nuance to rain patterns just before and after peak
summer, but I'll leave exploration of that to the next model where it's more
apparent.
0.4
Stellar Flux: 98.6% Earth's
Average Temperature: 15.8 °C (6.2 Apr - 27.6 Aug)
You may note that at this point that I've lowered CO2 to its minimum value in these models—roughly the minimum where oxygenic photosynthesis is still possible—and I've started lowering the stellar flux instead to counteract the
heating effect of higher eccentricity. One issue I've only noticed as I was
writing up this post is that ExoPlaSim's simple vegetation model is
sensitive to CO2, such that vegetation growth essentially stops at levels this low, so I
won't be showing any data from that (trading off a bit lower sunlight for a
bit more CO2
should let you get a very similar climate more amenable to plant life, so
this isn't an issue inherent to this type of climate; in the future I'll set
a higher minimum CO2
threshold for these runs). Note also that the stellar flux here is at the
semimajor axis (which appears to be how ExoPlaSim handles the input value
for flux); actual average insolation over the whole orbit will be a bit
higher.
Anyway, the climate is starting to look a bit weird again. This much
eccentricity causes over a 5-fold increase in insolation from apoapsis to
periapsis, and most of that increase comes in a 4-month peak around
periapsis, with little variation from September to April. The global climate
varies considerably throughout this brief summer, so I think it's worth it
to look through the year in a bit more detail here.
We'll start with March, where for the most part freezing temperatures reach
their maximum extent, far enough south in the northern hemisphere that the
temperate band is shrinking again as the continental climates squeeze it out. Otherwise, we see all the typical patterns we've come to expect: cool
landmasses cause weak onshore winds (to the point that the trade winds
almost seem to reverse couse to avoid Africa) and keep much of the tropics
fairly dry, while the higher latitudes are kept moderately wet by the Ferrel
cell winds. Overall it's worth noting throughout all these models how
clearly distinct the circulation cells are and how uniform the prevailing
winds compared to our Earth.
April is technically the coldest month on average, but this is mostly
because the oceans are still cooling, whereas land areas are starting to
warm again. This causes a slight strengthening of onshore winds that brings
more moisture into some equatorial areas.
Temperatures over land start rising sharply in May, with a corresponding
shift in winds—trade winds now start reversing course to converge onto continents rather
than avoid them and the Hadley cell has subtly expanded—and a full tropical rain belt has formed along the ITCZ. Higher latitudes
are still fairly wet at this point, though.
Within the next month, average temperatures rise by over 20 °C in many areas. Ocean temperatures lag behind, so winds rapidly
reorganize around the new sharp temperature gradients, with gale-force
onshore winds appearing on some coastlines. This results in a peculiar
precipitation pattern, with intense rains across much of the interiors of
the tropical continents but dry coastlines in many areas.
The next month sees a similar temperature increase, with averages spiking
to over 70 °C in some areas and daytime highs approaching the boiling point. Much of
the tropics and subtropics would likely be uninhabitable by humans. Winds
continue to reorganize to converge on these warm areas, but more broadly the
Hadley cells expand, drawing moisture away from the subtropical regions and
concentrating it into the interiors of the equatorial continents; though I
suspect we're also seeing something similar to polar summers on
high-obliquity worlds, where a rapid rise in summer heat prevents
condensation and precipitation of water even at high humidity. Either way,
some of the hottest parts of the world are always among the driest (and also
incidentally some of the windiest).
(The odd parallel waves of wet and dry strips around the coast are probably
an issue with ExoPlaSim related to the limited resolution and discrete
timesteps; the physics filters parameter helps reduce this tendency and
prevent crashes that can arise from it but don't eliminate it. The actual
planet would probably be more uniformly moderately dry in these areas.)
August is the warmest month globally, but much as we saw in winter, this is
mostly because of the oceans heating up, while land areas have turned the
corner and are beginning to cool down. This allows wind patterns to somewhat
settle back into more regular convection cell patterns, spreading out
moisture somewhat, especially towards coasts, but the Hadley cell remains
wide and so the subtropical areas dry.
By September, insolation has already dropped to about 1/3 of its peak in
early July. Ocean temperatures begin to catch up to those on land, but winds
still generally converge onto continents so we get something of a global wet
spell, with heavy rains in many subtropical areas kept dry through much of
summer but now with onshore winds again thanks to the shrinking Hadley
cells.
Thereafter, the climate enters a long autumn and winter; temperatures
gradually decline, the Hadley cells gradually shrink and weaken, and the
tropics gradually dry out (as do the poles as they cool down), a trend that
continues well past apoapsis until insolation begins to substantially
increase again in April. Thus, many areas that appear to have similar climates as they do on our
Earth are a bit different in character:
-
The tropics see pretty a pretty substantial swing between wet and dry
seasons and even 20-30 °C variation
in temperature, so rainforests are greatly reduced in favor of what are
likely seasonal dry forests and savanna similar to the monsoon regions
flanking the tropics on Earth.
-
Many of the arid regions actually see fairly substantial rains in
summer, but not enough to overcome the intense heat.
-
In the temperate and warm continental areas, Mediterranean climates are
far more prevalent, but much of these areas remain cold or even freezing
through much of winter and early spring and summers are intensely dry,
so it's only during fall when the rains return and some of the summer
heat lingers that there's much opportunity for growth.
-
Humid subtropical and monsoon-influenced climates, which on Earth are
some of the most hospitable and productive regions, here see heavy rain
only in early and late summer, flanking a couple months of sweltering
heat, no rain, and vicious winds; ideal conditions for massive
firestorms.
0.5
Prior Model: 0.4
CO2 Level: 10 ppm
Stellar Flux: 91.8% Earth's
Average Temperature: 15.8 °C (3.7 Apr - 31.8 Jul)
The ice cap and tundra climates have finally retreated to about the
same extent as our Earth, but, with a 9-fold increase in insolation from
apoapsis to periapsis, the rest of the world sees intense summer
temperature swings.
Large sections of the northern landmasses thaw completely in one month
between June and July, and part of Manchuria in particular flips from
just below freezing to over 50 °C; a temperature climb of almost 2 °C per day. These intense seasonal swings have squeezed out the temperate band in
much of Asia; hot arid climates transition to cold arid and then
continental climates. Even much of the formerly tropical regions dip
into temperate temperatures in winter.
With continents interiors often 30-40 °C hotter than adjacent oceans in July, fierce onshore summer winds
ravage many of the coastlines. The prevailing direction of the Hadley
cells still dominates over the oceans, though, keeping subtropical areas
dry.
Though the tropics still see heavy summer rains, the long, dry fall and
winter has eliminated much of the wet tropical climates. None of these
arid climates in the tropics and subtropics are too dry, though, with
how far rains shift around; no part of the planet (at the resolution of
this model) receives less than 39 mm of rain per year.
Prior Model: 0.5
CO2 Level: 10 ppm
Stellar Flux: 83.2% Earth's
Average Temperature: 14.1 °C (-0.5 Apr - 35.6 Jul)
If Earth had this much eccentricity, its orbit would cross those of both
Mercury and Mars (even if we shifted it out to get this much stellar flux,
though only just for Mercury). About half the total heating the planet
receives throughout the year arrives in June and July.
As you might expect, this drives an even more extreme temperature spike in
early summer. Manchuria now rises by over 70 °C between June and July, and the American midwest isn't far behind.
Both areas then drop back down by over 20 °C in August. During that July peak, temperatures in north Africa can
approach 150 °C (in an area that also cools enough for light snowfall in winter).
Even here, though, the polar ice caps persist, and overall the annual
average temperature distribution isn't actually much different from that for
the 0.1 eccentricity case, aside from this planet being 1.4 °C colder.
The hot summer, of course, drives intense summer winds...
...and rapid shifts in precipitation; globally rains almost stop in July. Even the equatorial landmasses only get a couple bursts of rain in early
and late summer, so have mostly given over to arid climates. Just to add insult to injury, cloud cover also almost completely clear over
much of the planet, giving no respite from the sun by day.
I'm frankly not sure this climate state would prove to be stable against
runaway greenhousing in the long term, but it's still interesting to wonder
how life might adapt to such conditions; in the harshest regions it might
still be possible to shelter through the brief summer—or at least produce seeds or eggs that can endure what adult organisms
can't—and then emerge with the late summer rains, onto a landscape that may be
cleared and fertilized by widespread wildfires, and grow as much as possible
through the long autumn.
This is as far as we'll take it today; all my attempts to simulate a world
with 0.7 eccentricity crashed within a few years, even when I lowered the
stellar flux enough that the planet froze over. Most likely something about
the rapid influx of heat in summer is too much for the model to reliably
handle. Reducing the timestep to very low values like 5 minutes or less
might help, but I've moved on to other models runs for now; leave a comment
if you manage to do any better. There are a few different parameters I might
explore next time depending on how the models work out, but most likely it
will be combinations of both obliquity and eccentricity.
Interesting stuff! Are the graphs made in Panoply using the ExoPlasim data?
ReplyDeleteYep, it's pretty straightforward to use.
Deleteall my attempts to simulate a world with 0.7 eccentricity crashed within a few years, even when I lowered the stellar flux enough that the planet froze over.
ReplyDeleteI was wondering about that with some of the lower eccentricity models. With a more Earth-like CO2 level, how low could you go in solar flux before the planet snowballs during apoapsis and basically can't warm up enough during periapsis to make up for it?
It makes for some pretty wild planets, in any case. Real "fire and ice" worlds - summer temperatures above the boiling temperature of water across vast swathes of the planet, and a thousand odd miles north places where it never gets above freezing.
It might be worth testing out how cool I could get one of the models for a mini-exploration in the future, or if it's possible at all to get a model that freezes completely in winter but can still thaw in summer, but it'll take a bit of tweaking to test properly.
DeleteVery interesting results! For other explorations, I would like to see atmospheric pressure, gravity, very long days (all the way to tidally-locked), Earth under different star types, and possibly combinations all-of-the-above. You could also consider posting worlds of some of the works you’ve been commissioned for.
ReplyDeleteThe previous entry in this series covered day lengths up to month-long days, I want to come back around to even longer days eventually, but it takes a bit of wrangling with exoplasim to make sure the timings work out well, and deeper analysis because we generally can't rely on the Koppen system to accurately reflect those types of climates. Properly tidal-locked worlds are going to be their whole own set of explorations, I'm largely putting them off until I get through all the obvious parameters to play with for non-locked worlds first. Different star types, different positions in the habitable zone, and different surface pressures are all queued up for future explorations, though we may have to see how well the model handles the more extreme cases, and I'll get to different planet sizes (with appropriate gravity) at some point soon after that (also want to try different land areas, but I'll have to think about handling that in terms of topography).
DeleteI recently did a mini-exploration with some commissioned models of Earth with the topography shifted around relative to the rotational axis, and I'd be open to doing that sort of thing again, but most of the commissioned climates I do just have different topography, so there's not really many wider conclusions to be drawn and I prefer to let the clients present the results for their worlds however they prefer.
Another idea I forgot to mention would be to do climate explorations of a possible ancient climate or a ‘terraformed’ Venus and Mars.
DeleteVenus would keep it’s long rotation period but have an average temperature of just 35°c and have an atmosphere that’s only 4-5 bars (and mainly consisting of nitrogen and oxygen instead of carbon dioxide). Mars would be slightly colder at an average temperature of 10°c and have an atmospheric pressure similar to Earth or slightly lower, again mostly consisting of Nitrogen and Oxygen. I know Mars can’t hold onto water vapour that well and Venus receives more than 1.1 insolation but just the theoretical habitability would be an interesting exploration to consider.
It is something I've thought of, ancient Venus might work, it's at least worth a shot (though debate continues on whether such a habitability period ever did actually exist). I've also thought of using Venus topography for explorations on varying sea level, as Earth topography gets a bit weird when you lower the sea level a lot, whereas any sea level on Venus tends to get you reasonably contiguous landmasses and seas.
DeleteAncient or terraformed Mars may be a challenge; it would require either pretty high CO2 levels, which ExoPlaSim can't really handle realistically, or other greenhouse gasses, which ExoPlaSim can't really do at all (outside of CO2, water which it handles internally, and ozone in a very narrow way only appropriate for very earthlike cases), so we'd probably have to propose there were space mirrors or something to increase solar flux for Mars.
Interesting insights! I would’ve thought Mars would be slightly easier to explore as I’ve already seen some attempts online at producing climate maps for a terraformed Mars using other programs (but none for Venus). A terraformed but sweltering/jungle Venus with it’s asynchronous retrograde long-days interests me the most as I am currently looking at worldbuilding with similar parameters.
DeleteA fair bit of previous modelling indicates that at its modern insolation, a wet Venus is unlikely to have any stable climate
DeleteCan’t say I’m surprised. Although according to this paper: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/787/1/L2/pdf , Venus could’ve had habitable conditions (avoiding runaway greenhouse) because it’s slow rotation rate allows cloud formations that raise the bond albedo to 0.6. Although this was when the sun was less bright and before Venus went through a LIP resurfacing period ( https://eos.org/research-spotlights/how-long-was-venus-habitable ). Maybe with reduced insolation and keeping the very slow rotation, exoplasim could be used to show ancient Venus’ climates?
DeleteThat would be how I'd approach habitable Venus, yes, though there has been more research casting doubt on whether an initially warm Venus (as all planets are immediately after forming) could have cooled down to form liquid oceans in the first place https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03873-w
DeleteCould you try a climate explorations set for orbits with an Earthlike eccentricity but a different Orbital Radius? I'd be interested to know how close to or far from the sun Earth can be in this simulation software without becoming completely uninhabitable.
ReplyDeleteSeveral of these already have average stellar flux adjusted down (equivalent to increasing orbital radius, except I didn't adjust year length), and are getting pretty dramatically hot in summer, so are probably already close to the inner limit. As I said above, exploring very cool eccentric worlds might be an interesting exercise, and I may do an exploration on different orbital distance for non-eccentric worlds but I've still got a fair few higher-priority explorations to do (planet size, land area, atmospheric pressure) before I start looking into all the potential combinations (though I may do obliquity + eccentricity soon)
Delete