Public Climate Data Explorations: Habitable Mars
This is a second in a series of posts looking at data from previously published climate modelling that I can work into climate maps. To reiterate from the first post, I did not run these models myself, I’m just making maps based on them, and because much of this data contains only average data, I’m mostly making maps of Holdridge life zones using estimates of average biotemperature that are based on Earth’s seasons so may not exactly apply here (aside from a couple cases with no seasons where I can assume average biotemperature is about the same as average temperature).
Today, we’ll look at a couple studies modelling the climate of a potentially habitable early Mars. For those out of the loop, the general consensus among researchers based on pretty clear geological evidence is that Mars probably had a period with a substantial atmosphere and bodies of water on the surface at some point in the first billion or so years after it formed, but exactly how much water and air it had and how long this period lasted remain open discussions.
The papers we’re discussing today attempt to reconstruct that early Martian climate at a couple points in its history based on reasonable guesses at the potential atmosphere and water content. But you might also use these results as a rough template for how a terraformed Mars might appear as it warmed up, though the lower insolation than modern Mars and somewhat human-unfriendly atmospheric composition in these models mean they’re not a perfect fit (I looked and managed to track down one attempt to simulate the climate of a modern terraformed Mars, but it’s not especially detailed).
Don’t take these models as totally authoritative on the climate of Early Mars, though; other models have proposed cooler or more transiently warm climates that still match up decently well with at least some of the geological evidence, but the models we’ll look at today are still interesting as one possibility—and even if they don’t pan out for Mars’s case, they still hold some lessons for the potential climates of other small, dry, cool planets.
For reference, here’s the topography of modern Mars:
Today, we’ll look at a couple studies modelling the climate of a potentially habitable early Mars. For those out of the loop, the general consensus among researchers based on pretty clear geological evidence is that Mars probably had a period with a substantial atmosphere and bodies of water on the surface at some point in the first billion or so years after it formed, but exactly how much water and air it had and how long this period lasted remain open discussions.
The papers we’re discussing today attempt to reconstruct that early Martian climate at a couple points in its history based on reasonable guesses at the potential atmosphere and water content. But you might also use these results as a rough template for how a terraformed Mars might appear as it warmed up, though the lower insolation than modern Mars and somewhat human-unfriendly atmospheric composition in these models mean they’re not a perfect fit (I looked and managed to track down one attempt to simulate the climate of a modern terraformed Mars, but it’s not especially detailed).
Don’t take these models as totally authoritative on the climate of Early Mars, though; other models have proposed cooler or more transiently warm climates that still match up decently well with at least some of the geological evidence, but the models we’ll look at today are still interesting as one possibility—and even if they don’t pan out for Mars’s case, they still hold some lessons for the potential climates of other small, dry, cool planets.
For reference, here’s the topography of modern Mars:
Notable highlights include the ~8-km deep Hellas basin in the southeast, an enormous impact crater, the ~12-km high Tharsis volcanic plateau in the equatorial west, and a ~4 km escarpment ringing the planet between the younger, flatter northern lowlands and older, more cratered southern highlands. The planet orbits at 1.52 AU, giving it a 687-day year and about 43% the insolation of Earth, and it currently has 0.093 eccentricity, a 24.7-hour day, and 25.19° eccentricity, though the obliquity may have varied significantly over time. It has a 0.006-bar CO2 atmosphere and a bracing average temperature of -60 °C, though equatorial regions can occasionally rise above freezing; but the thin atmosphere means any liquid water on the surface would promptly sublimate anyway.
"3D Simulations of the Early Martian Hydrological Cycle Mediated by a H2-CO2 Greenhouse"
Guzewich et al. 2021
This study simulates a set of scenarios for a potentially habitable Mars about 3.8 billion years ago, when the sun was 3/4 of its modern luminosity so the planet had just 32% of the insolation of modern Earth. Despite this, the study shows how various combinations of CO2, H2, and CH4 could have allowed for habitable surface temperatures.
The study includes a lot of model outputs, so I’ll pick out some highlights: most of the models are just testing various atmospheric mixes without any surface water, so you can see the paper for temperature maps, but the short version is that as you warm the planet, Hellas reaches above-freezing temperatures first, then a few other basins before the whole north thaws, but much of Tharsis remains frozen over even in the warmest models.
For our purposes the interesting models are all run with a 2-bar atmosphere of 94% CO2, 5% H2, and 1% CH4. The study first experiments with a few different levels of initial water in the soil or in shallow lakes, but in all cases most of the water promptly becomes trapped in ice on Tharsis; more initial water actually leaves less leftover because it allows larger glaciers to form and cool the plateau further. Some water always remains in circulation and brings light rain over parts of the desert, with a few particularly wet patches on the west flank of Tharsis that catch moisture from the tropical winds (due in part to its smaller size, Mars has a single equator-crossing tropical circulation cell with winds curving around to blow predominantly east at low latitudes, rather than Earth’s paired Hadley cells with west-trending winds), but never enough to show up on the climate maps. Meltwater out of these glaciers could potentially be another major source of water to the area around Tharsis in these scenarios, but isn’t extensively modelled here.
Things get a bit more exciting when they introduce a small sea in the Hellas basin, bringing more substantial rains to the southern hemisphere:
They then also add a larger ocean in the north as well (the paper implies this model excluded the Hellas sea, but the data here seems to include it):
The heavily cratered terrain gives us a pretty noisy precipitation distribution, but we can see some overall patterns: the surface is still mostly arid, but with wetter regions around the oceans that could likely support some vegetation, and again Tharsis catches some moisture on its western flank but casts a long rainshadow to its east.
The study also includes a few models with a speculative prehistoric Martian topography assuming that Tharsis formed after this point in Mars’s history and that its rise caused the rotational axis to shift. This reconstruction remains controversial, but without Tharsis trapping water (the pre-Tharsis highlands in the southwest of this map are much lower and trap far less water), adding small amounts of initial water more substantially increases global precipitation:
The study also includes a few models with a speculative prehistoric Martian topography assuming that Tharsis formed after this point in Mars’s history and that its rise caused the rotational axis to shift. This reconstruction remains controversial, but without Tharsis trapping water (the pre-Tharsis highlands in the southwest of this map are much lower and trap far less water), adding small amounts of initial water more substantially increases global precipitation:
With 10-meter-deep initial lakes:
With 100-meter-deep initial lakes:
With 500-meter-deep initial lakes:
The last model seems to imply a lush global climate despite the lack of seas, but that’s quite a bit of initial water and the output data is a little unclear about exactly how much area this is covering (ROCKE-3D allows for modelling lakes with dynamically adjusting water levels rather than set seas, but I’m not totally sure how to interpret the data as actual lake area); I suspect that much of this terrain is covered in small seas caught in the irregular terrain that’s providing rain to the surrounding area, whereas in reality this climate would probably be accompanied by widespread erosion, forming channels which would allow water to drain into a few larger seas, resulting in a somewhat drier overall climate.
As well as being an interesting look at a habitable Mars, this also gives us a potential template for cool, dry worlds generally: mostly arid, but with potential for wet regions even with low amounts of global water, but heavily dependent on topography and particularly the presence of potential cold traps.
One other trend I want to highlight is that—at least outside the frozen southern highlands—the higher, cooler areas tend to be the wettest here, somewhat the reverse of the tendency on Earth; those two wet spots in the north are highlands and the hot, dry patches in the southeast are deep basins (sometimes higher areas are marked as wetter climates on climate maps just because they’re cooler and so have less evaporation, but this isn’t the case here: precipitation is substantially higher in these cool highlands and very low in the basins). The study doesn’t discuss this much, but presumably this is due to orographic rains in the highlands and adiabatic heating in the lowlands; as air descends several kilometers into the basins, it warms and dries. On Earth these tend to be secondary effects relative to the main circulation cells that control the distribution of precipitation, but due either to Mars’s different circulation or the lower total water availability, topographic effects are just more prominent here.
As well as being an interesting look at a habitable Mars, this also gives us a potential template for cool, dry worlds generally: mostly arid, but with potential for wet regions even with low amounts of global water, but heavily dependent on topography and particularly the presence of potential cold traps.
One other trend I want to highlight is that—at least outside the frozen southern highlands—the higher, cooler areas tend to be the wettest here, somewhat the reverse of the tendency on Earth; those two wet spots in the north are highlands and the hot, dry patches in the southeast are deep basins (sometimes higher areas are marked as wetter climates on climate maps just because they’re cooler and so have less evaporation, but this isn’t the case here: precipitation is substantially higher in these cool highlands and very low in the basins). The study doesn’t discuss this much, but presumably this is due to orographic rains in the highlands and adiabatic heating in the lowlands; as air descends several kilometers into the basins, it warms and dries. On Earth these tend to be secondary effects relative to the main circulation cells that control the distribution of precipitation, but due either to Mars’s different circulation or the lower total water availability, topographic effects are just more prominent here.
“Circumpolar Ocean Stability on Mars 3 Gy ago”
Schmidt et al. 2022
This study brings us to a point a bit later, 3 billion years ago. Geological evidence indicates that Mars had significantly cooled or dried by this point, but exactly how much remains a point of contention): Erosion by water over the southern highlands seems to have stopped, which is generally taken to indicate that the planet must have frozen over or dried out by this point and so lost any earlier oceans, but erosion still continued in the lower northern regions and there is even evidence for unfrozen seas. Transiently warm climates or even brief warming after major impact events have been proposed as explanations, but this study attempts to model a stable cool but wet climate.
Insolation here is set to a slightly higher 33% of modern Earth, and modern Mars topography is used (save that the northern ice cap is removed) with deep oceans filling in Hellas and the northern lowlands. A 1-bar atmosphere of mostly CO2 is used with either 10% or 20% H2, and for each H2 level 4 models are run with 0°, 20°, 40°, and 60° obliquity (another set of models for all these cases is also run with a non-dynamic ocean for comparison’s sake, but I’ll skip those).
I’ll start with the 20% H2 models, because these are about the same as the last study and probably not actually a good match for Mars at this point in time.
0° tilt (the eccentric orbit would still give a bit of seasonality but I’ve assumed constant average temperature for simplicity’s sake, which also allows me to make a seasonless Koppen map):
20°, which is the closest to modern Mars:
40°, which the authors consider most likely for ancient Mars:
60°, which is high enough that my assumed average temperature-biotemperature relation probably doesn’t work too well:
The 10% H2 models seem to be closer to the authors’ expectations for Mars at this time and also have monthly climate data included, so I can provide proper Koppen-Geiger maps, though I’ll still do Holdridge zones for comparison (using the monthly data for biotemperature rather than my estimation scheme from average temperature).
0°:
20°:
40°:
60°:
There's maybe a bit of disagreement here between the Koppen and Holdridge schemes about how dry these areas are, but that's always a bit hard to nail down for very cool regions where evaporation rates are low and a lot of moisture may be present as ice and snow throughout the year, which is inaccessible to plants while frozen but can provide significant meltwater in spring.
The main argument of this study is that ocean circulation (as is properly modelled in ROCKE-3D) could allow for unfrozen Martian oceans to persist even in a globally cold average climate. Again, aside from the specific interest in Mars, this gives us a template for another type of marginal climate, a near-snowball world with large areas of cold desert but also a surviving warm sea and some reasonably hospitable patches along the coastlines (and this might also be taken as a template for a partially terraformed Mars if seas are added early).
That’s it for today. Other modelling has been done for various scenarios of Mars at various points in its history, but either didn’t fully model processes like rainfall or don’t have publicly available data. Regardless, the general consensus seems to be that episodes of at least locally wet conditions might have occurred for a while, but by about 2 billion years ago the planet had completely dried up; any water not trapped in ice or subsurface aquifers was lost to space, and probably most of the atmosphere as well.
That’s it for today. Other modelling has been done for various scenarios of Mars at various points in its history, but either didn’t fully model processes like rainfall or don’t have publicly available data. Regardless, the general consensus seems to be that episodes of at least locally wet conditions might have occurred for a while, but by about 2 billion years ago the planet had completely dried up; any water not trapped in ice or subsurface aquifers was lost to space, and probably most of the atmosphere as well.
Next of these posts will probably be climate models of Venus; see you then.
Excellent work! I was looking forward to this post! What was the average temperature of Mars in the models you used simulating Mars at different obliquity? Also, I would love to see a similar exploration for Venus (although this would be based on assumptions that Venus wasn’t always too hot for oceans)
ReplyDeleteIf you go to the second paper, it has a supplemtary data document with a lot summary statistics and maps of climate data; for the 10% h2 cases the averages are all around -3 to -10 C. I have already found a few models of Venus in the literature, but they tend to be more speculative, there's not much geological data to go on there.
DeleteRE: Worldbuilding Pasta
DeleteIdeas of Venus' geology seem a lot more in flux these days, especially with the confirmation of widespread, active volcanism.
I wouldn’t mind even just seeing a modern topography map of Venus but with 50-70% ocean coverage and habitable temperatures. Just curious how the köppen climate system would look given Venus’ very long days and almost 180° obliquity
Delete180 degrees is as good as 0 degrees obliquity so far as climate is concerned, but how to apply Koppen-Geiger zones to Venus's long days is a quandary I'll be mostly dodging by virtue of most of my sources just not having sufficient data about seasonal variation anyway.
DeleteAnd when I brought up the geology stuff it was less about topography--they all just use the modern topography because there's nothing else to go on, and that's largely true of these Mars models as well--and more that we simply have no direct evidence so far for what the ancient Venus climate was like, whereas we seem to be converging on a range of reasonable climate scenarios for Mars's climate evolution.
That sounds like it bodes poorly for cold, arid worlds. They likely wouldn't have plate tectonics without sufficient surface water, and so they'd get volcanism pushing up huge volcanic highlands that would then become the cold traps you mentioned.
ReplyDeleteIt's pretty neat that a warm, partially unfrozen sea might have persisted for a long time. If Mars ever developed life (or imported it via impacts), I wonder if it ever developed photosynthesis.
Looking forward to the Venus modeling. I've wondered if Venus was actually cursed with too much water in its development - if it was a dry world from the beginning, the extremely long days might have kept it from a runaway greenhouse situation like how it should for tidally locked planets in general.
I'm less inclined to assume that enormous highland plateaus like Tharsis will be the norm, it seems to be a particular result of Mars's cooling history
DeleteFor your Venus post, will you be making a Köppen–Geiger climate classification map?
ReplyDeleteMost of what I've found doesn't include enough data, and how koppen-geiger zones should be applied to the very long days of Venus is tricky to say anyway
DeleteBased on my current assumptions and your posts about day length, I think Venus would probably have mostly a mix of oceanic (or tropical in warmer areas) and desert. This is since Venus largely lacks seasons and given the Köppen system will average out everything for day length, that’s probably the only possible classification that can represent climate in such a world
DeleteWhen you have a day that long (certainly longer than a month, the typical Koppen sampling period), would you not consider the variation throughout the day as effectively equivalent to seasons?
DeleteYes, but the Köppen system isn’t designed for asynchronous rotators. Their periods of hot and cold in certain locations probably would not be consistent throughout the year.
DeleteIn addition to that, Venus has almost no obliquity. I would expect Venus’ köppen climates to resemble tidally-locked except the tropical and oceanic band extend all the way across the equator while the deserts remain closer to the poles
DeleteOh and one more thing, Venus also has a very circular orbit (almost no eccentricity). Either way I would be interested to see how a köppen map would turn out.
DeleteThat the koppen system wasn't designed for very long days means there isn't really a set standard for how they're handled. If you split the year (or day) of a habitable venus with its current day lenth into 12 segments (or month-long segments or any sample period less than just an overall average) you would necessarily see substantial temperature variation due to the day-night cycle. There's nothing in the design of the Koppen scheme specifying that this sort of variation should be averaged out or anything like that because it's just not a situation it was designed to address, and I don't see we a reason we should do that. We're concerned with seasons in the Koppen system mostly because of their impact on temperature, so it particularly matter what's causing that temperature variation. Yes, if you sampled many years together and averaged them together based on timing in the orbit, that variation would eventually all average out due to the asynchronicity, but should you do that? Given the lack of other seasonal forcings, it might make more sense to treat the day as effectively the equivalent to a year in this climate in terms of seasons.
DeleteAgain, this is largely moot here because the sources I'll be looking at doesn't have that kind of time-segmented data anyway, but eventually I'll probably get around to dealing with long days in my own climate explorations and I'm not entirely sure how to handle them in these terms yet (when you have long asynchronous days and obliquity you can have odd cases where temperature varies on cycles of different length at different latitudes), and probably there is no good answer for trying to apply the Koppen system there because it's just sorta out of scope for it, but I don't see a case for intentionally trying to obscure that sort of temperature variation within each year just because it doesn't quite line up with the orbit.
Very good points to be fair. Perhaps we need a new climate scheme specifically for asynchronicity lol
DeleteI found something that might interest you when you make your habitable Venus post: https://youtu.be/R2Er8q-m-c4?feature=shared
Deletehttps://github.com/ilyenkov/terraforming_maps/blob/main/README.md
DeleteEven more interesting stuff here: http://www.worlddreambank.org/V/VENUS.HTM#clim
DeleteI've seen these and neither involve any actual climate modelling
DeleteHow long do you think Mars could hold on to its initial hydrogen?
ReplyDeleteWe're not yet sure that Mars did have any atmospheric hydrogen, it's just an easy potential answer to how it maintained a warm early climate. If it did, it may be as much a question of how long volcanic hydrogen production was sustained as how fast atmospheric hydrogen escaped
DeleteMore recent work has suggested that the dominant long term hydrogen sink was in the crust (see Scheller et al., 2021) so the question may be how long volcanic hydrogen could remain without reacting with oxidized species relative to emissions
DeleteThanks! I've not kept up with the Martian climate modelling literature for a few years and this was fun to read. The geomorphic and hydrological modelling work on the later stage of liquid water around the Gale crater (and potentially Jezero!) region (somewhere in ~3.5-3.3 Ga) seems to suggest a semi arid climate (Dave Horvath likens it to Kansas in talks) (see Horvath and Andrews-Hanna, 2021, 2024; Roseborough et al., 2021; Putnam et al., 2021; Rivera-Hernandez and Palucis, 2019). Also interesting to consider Kite's ideas about a change from latitudinal to altitudinal control with changes in atmospheric pressure and lapse rate (The Kite paper you cite; Kite and Noblet, 2022; some of his other papers I think)
ReplyDeleteI’ve been looking at the Worldbuilder’s Log by Edgar of Artifexian for a while, and so realized a few days ago that ice ages on CRETAK might need to be accommodated for. I mean, Biblaridion accommodated for those on TIRA 292B in Alien Biospheres, and remember the impact the last ice age had on our world? The Taeys River. The Great Lakes. Other examples I need to think about.
ReplyDeleteI think that was explained in the plate tectonic history episodes and thus why the high mountains and the southern continent were still ice cap climates in the present.
DeleteThere is a simulator that seems to be used for climate in day by day basis, and while it is really slow, at 6 hour per year on two
ReplyDelete2x E5-2650 each server with 128 gb of memory, it could simulate higher resolution than exoplasim, and could also simulate ocean current. might be useful for climates,and you could gather inputs from exoplasim output to classify land use.
Your approach to model climates of Earth in varioud scenarios has a major flaw. If you need to warm or cool planet to specific average temperature playing with CO2 amount is not a good strategy. When CO2 amount in atmosphere increases, it warms polar areas much more strongly than tropics. For example increasing CO2 level up to 2000 ppm would increase average temperature of tropics only 6 degrees higher, but for poles it would be enough to replace polar deserts with temperate forests which would have snow in winter only and in summer would warm up to +20C ( however the tropics will still always be warmer than polar areas and at some point adding more CO2 won't make temperature curve flatter ). In this video Crystopher Scottse ( known paleoclimatologist ) shows this dynamic with more details. https://youtu.be/VaaSoEsrtkk
ReplyDeleteIt seems that your simulation programme doesn't know this pattern and instead just warms ( or cools ) everything linearly instead of flattening or sharpening temperature curve between lattitudes when needed. So because of this if you need to change global average temperature it is much more correct to change amount of solar radiation reaching the planet, because it would just make everything X degrees warmer or cooler without making poles warmer or cooler than they should actually be.
Well first off this particular post is climate simulations I didn't run myself and don't follow that methodology.
DeleteBut more to the point, there is some truth to this but not really in the way you describe. Poles tend to respond stronger to climate forcing largely because of ice albedo feedbacks; with a warmer global climate, the ice melts, the albedo drops, and so the polar regions absorb substantially greater heat (even without a permanent polar ice cap, there will be less snow cover in spring). For the sort of range of scenarios we're mostly concerned with (i.e. in Earth-similarish orbits), this is true largely regardless of what is making the global climate warmer or colder, so no, adjusting insolation instead will not avoid this effect, and more broadly there just isn't any simple way to "make everything x degrees warmer" in climate. ExoPlaSim definitely "knows" about this in the sense that it is modelling the fundamental ice and albedo dynamics that this effect emerges from.
Also there's not any 1-to-1 correspondence between relative pole and equator temperature or overall climate and any specific level of CO2, it's down to the overall balance of forcings. A world with 10 times more CO2 is not necessarily going to have a radically different climate if other warming factors are reduced by a corresponding amount. The general idea of adjusting CO2 is to try to offset any overall warming or cooling effect of the other parameters we're playing with in any particular exploration so that we're not just ending up with a bunch of very warm or cold climates that aren't particularly useful as worldbuilding exercises. I am actually switching over to adjusting solar flux instead of CO2, but that's just because changing CO2 too much can mess with the vegetation model; in terms of their effect on overall climate and temperature, the two forcings aren't quite identical but for the sort of scenarios we're doing they're not substantially different.
If you put ‘habitable ancient Venus’ (from Way et al. and Yang et al.’s studies) using its modern topography, slow rotation and solar flux to achieve an average temperature of ~25°C, does the Köppen map give BWh/BSh coasts and polar regions combined with mostly Cwa interiors? How would life (if it existed) fair in such a climate scenario?
ReplyDelete*ancient 700 mya solar flux (but I presume modern solar flux would lead to negative feedback through increased albedo and the average temperature wouldn’t be that much higher)
DeleteBtw this would be assuming ~70% water coverage. Obviously, drier models would have more desert and less humid climates.
Delete